<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Chucksphere &#187; Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chucksphere.com/category/reading/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chucksphere.com</link>
	<description>The internet home of Charlie Piggott since 2006.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Breaking News: Roland Emmerich Plans to Ruin SF Classic &#8220;Foundation&#8221; Forever</title>
		<link>http://chucksphere.com/2010/02/14/breaking-news-roland-emmerich-plans-to-ruin-sf-classic-foundation-forever/%</link>
		<comments>http://chucksphere.com/2010/02/14/breaking-news-roland-emmerich-plans-to-ruin-sf-classic-foundation-forever/%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck.P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucksphere.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MTV News has exclusively learned from Emmerich himself that &#8220;Foundation&#8221; will be a 3-D epic using technology similar to the CG motion-capture techniques used in &#8220;Avatar.&#8221; (MTV Movies Blog)
Why God why do these stories have to be special-effects extravaganzas? I mean, there are some parts that would be more demanding of special-effects than, say, an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>MTV News has exclusively learned from Emmerich himself that &#8220;Foundation&#8221; will be a 3-D epic using technology similar to the CG motion-capture techniques used in &#8220;<a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/tag/avatar">Avatar</a>.&#8221; (<a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/02/11/exclusive-roland-emmerich-plans-foundation-as-3-d-motion-capture-epic/">MTV Movies Blog</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Why God why do these stories have to be special-effects extravaganzas? I mean, there are some parts that would be more demanding of special-effects than, say, an episode of<em> Lost</em>, but I cannot for the life of me figure out why a series that consists mostly of dialogue and exposition needs to be done in complete CGI? I think it&#8217;s a safe bet to say that these movies (there will be three of them) will probably diverge from their source material into some SFX-encrusted action-fest, like <em>I, Robot</em>. I&#8217;m sure the momentum of Dr. Asimov spinning in his grave right now is enough to power the entire Eastern Seaboard. (Roland Emmerich Fights Global Warming?)</p>
<p>If someone had asked <em>me</em>, I could probably have done it as a proper mini-series at about the same price per episode as an episode of <em>Battlestar Galactica</em>. But no-one ever fucking <em>does</em> ask me, do they? And now it&#8217;s ruined forever.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuinedFOREVER">Ruined FOREVER</a></em>.</p>
<p>Also, a faux text-trailor I found particularly amusing. (<a href="http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=12110613&amp;postcount=21">Courtesty of the Straight Dope</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chucksphere.com/2010/02/14/breaking-news-roland-emmerich-plans-to-ruin-sf-classic-foundation-forever/%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Krugman and the Public Option</title>
		<link>http://chucksphere.com/2009/09/13/paul-krugman-and-the-public-option/%</link>
		<comments>http://chucksphere.com/2009/09/13/paul-krugman-and-the-public-option/%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck.P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucksphere.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a week ago, Paul Krugman had this to say about the necessity of the public option:
&#8220;Remember, to make reform work we have to have an individual mandate. And everything I see says that there will be a major backlash against the idea of forcing people to buy insurance from the existing companies. That backlash [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a week ago, <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/">Paul Krugman</a> had this to say about the necessity of the public option:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">&#8220;Remember, to make reform work we have to have an individual mandate. And everything I see says that there will be a major backlash against the idea of forcing people to buy insurance from the existing companies. That backlash was part of what got Obama the nomination! Having the public option offers a defense against that backlash.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">What worries me is not so much that the backlash would stop reform from passing, as that it would store up trouble for the not-too-distant future. Imagine that reform passes, but that premiums shoot up (or even keep rising at the rates of the past decade.) Then you could all too easily have many people blaming Obama et al for forcing them into this increasingly unaffordable system.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">&#8212;-<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/why-the-public-option-matters/">Why the Public Option Matters</a></p>
<p>He&#8217;s absolutly right. With the idea of an individual mandate the most likely part of the reform package to pass, the public option is the only thing seperating a sensible attempt at healthcare reform from a massive handout to insurance companies. If there is no public option, there is no incentive for insurance companies to become more competitive price-wise, and yet they will still recive an influx of 50,000,000 customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chucksphere.com/2009/09/13/paul-krugman-and-the-public-option/%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Recent Drafts&#8221; (aka. Reading on the Internet)</title>
		<link>http://chucksphere.com/2009/08/14/recent-drafts-aka-reading-on-the-internet/%</link>
		<comments>http://chucksphere.com/2009/08/14/recent-drafts-aka-reading-on-the-internet/%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck.P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucksphere.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s anything you should know about me, it&#8217;s that I&#8217;m lazy. Dead lazy. I&#8217;ll start things and let them hang in the wind until they aren&#8217;t relavent anymore. I have 5 saved drafts of articles that I started in April and May that are so out of date that, even if I still felt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s anything you should know about me, it&#8217;s that I&#8217;m lazy. Dead lazy. I&#8217;ll start things and let them hang in the wind until they aren&#8217;t relavent anymore. I have 5 saved drafts of articles that I started in April and May that are so out of date that, even if I still felt strongly enough about the topic to actually write them, would be of absolutely zero interest to anyone (as if anyone was interested in anything I had to say to begin with). So, this post is a dump of all the links from those various dead articles, arranged topicaly. (Plus a few other misc links I had lying around).</p>
<h3><span id="more-128"></span>Torture</h3>
<p><a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/white-house-to-declassify-holy-grail-torture-report-that-could-undercut-cheney/">White House to Declassify &#8220;Holy Grail&#8221; Torture Report that Could Undercut Cheney</a>: A redacted version of the Special Review can be found <a href="http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/052708/052708_Special_Review.pdf">here</a>. I cannot find a more complete version online.</p>
<p><a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/04/hoekstra_congress_knew.php">Hoekstra: Congress Knew</a></p>
<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/the-unbalanced.html">The Unbalanced</a>: Sullivan on Cheney on Torture</p>
<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/04/thiessens-la-tower-canard.html">Thiessen&#8217;s LA Tower Canard</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/olc_memos.html">Bush OLC Torture Memos</a>: Bybee and Bradbury</p>
<p>Army Human Intelligence Collector Operations: The Army&#8217;s Interrogation Field Manual</p>
<h3>Waterboarding</h3>
<p>Still torture, but these all were supposed to go in the same post.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/22/hannity-offers-to-be-wate_n_190354.html">Hannity Offers to be Waterboarded for Charity</a></p>
<p><a href="http://johnmckay.blogspot.com/2009/04/should-we-waterboard-sean-hannity.html">Why we shouldn&#8217;t waterboard Sean Hannity</a>: The guys kind of got a point.</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/23/oblermann-charity-mancow/">Olbermann Rescinds Charity Offer For Cowardly Hannity, Donates $10K For Mancow’s Waterboarding</a></p>
<p><a href="http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/conservative-radio-hosts-waterboarded/">Conservative radio hosts gets waterboarded, and lasts six seconds before saying its torture</a>: Not Hannity, different guy</p>
<p><a href="http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=448717">Man Waterboards self, says it&#8217;s torture</a></p>
<h3>Wiretapping</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/obama/index.html">New and worse secrecy and immunity claims from the Obama DOJ</a>: from Glenn Greenwald</p>
<p><a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_Administration_quietly_expands_Bushs_legal_0407.html">Obama Administration quietly expands Bush&#8217;s legal defense of wiretapping program</a></p>
<h3>Obama</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/8lapx/what_exactly_has_changed_under_obama_the_rich_get/">What exactly has &#8220;changed&#8221; under Obama?</a>: A thread about <a href="http://www.prosebeforehos.com/word-of-the-day/05/17/why-act-surprised-pelosi-and-reid-are-accomplices-in-bushs-war-crimes/?reddit">this</a> article, which sparked <a href="http://www.prosebeforehos.com/alec/05/19/the-day-i-was-outed-as-a-republican-operative/">this</a> hysteria on Reddit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/29/obamas-100-days-press-con_n_193143.html">Obama&#8217;s 100-day-mark Press Conference</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=223862&amp;title=baracknophobia-obey">Baracknaphobia</a>: from The Daily Show</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prosebeforehos.com/political-ironing/04/06/you-gotta-protect-the-ones-you-serve/?">You Gotta Protect the Ones you Serve</a></p>
<h3>Other/Misc</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=226121&amp;title=cliff-may-unedited-interview">John Stewart interviews Cliff May</a>: I can&#8217;t play video on dial-up, so I have no idea what this is regarding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chucksphere.com/2009/08/14/recent-drafts-aka-reading-on-the-internet/%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>xkcd is Usually Right&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://chucksphere.com/2009/07/13/xkcd-is-usually-right/%</link>
		<comments>http://chucksphere.com/2009/07/13/xkcd-is-usually-right/%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck.P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucksphere.com/2009/07/13/xkcd-is-usually-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;and today it&#8217;s even more right. TV Tropes and Cracked are great ways to not get done what you mean to get done.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and <a href="http://xkcd.com/609/">today</a> it&#8217;s even more right. TV Tropes and Cracked are great ways to not get done what you mean to get done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chucksphere.com/2009/07/13/xkcd-is-usually-right/%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crackpottery</title>
		<link>http://chucksphere.com/2009/04/10/crackpottery/%</link>
		<comments>http://chucksphere.com/2009/04/10/crackpottery/%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck.P</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucksphere.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading Pharyngula today when I came accross a link to these letters. The astounding amount of craziness oozing out of these missives really took me off balance. I&#8217;m 19 years old, and have essentially never lived without the internet, so I&#8217;m used to all of the crackpot wing-nuttery I&#8217;ve seen on it, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/04/no_one_may_ever_have_the_same.php">Pharyngula</a> today when I came accross a link to <a href="http://www.mjt.org/exhibits/letters/letters.html">these letters</a>. The astounding amount of craziness oozing out of these missives really took me off balance. I&#8217;m 19 years old, and have essentially never lived without the internet, so I&#8217;m used to all of the crackpot wing-nuttery I&#8217;ve seen on it, and more-or-less associated the crazies with the internet. After all, the internet allows them to contact each other and feed each others&#8217; wackiness. The 911 Truth movement and the right-wing screamers who claim that Obama is a secret Kenyan Crypto-Muslim all seemingly grew out of the internet and couldn&#8217;t survive in the world goverened by the laws of reason.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s easy to forget that the internet isn&#8217;t just the collected thoughts of some Anonymous being. These are people&#8217;s thoughts, and there has always been a certain part of the human population that&#8217;s been out of touch with reality in some way or another. The JFK assassination, alien abductions, etc have had their conspiracy theorists for decades. Strange cults and even major religions all started with <em>someone</em> who wasn&#8217;t fully grounded in reality. And there&#8217;s always someone out to get you. These were ubiquitous in culture even before the advent of the internet, it&#8217;s just that the web has made it cheaper for those voices to speak: what was once limited to the scribblings of a schizophrenic are now available on the web as the typings of the schizophrenic.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.cognitionandculture.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=435:how-i-found-glaring-errors-in-einsteins-calculations&amp;catid=57:pascals-blog&amp;Itemid=34">Further Reading</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chucksphere.com/2009/04/10/crackpottery/%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
